I think it is a good idea. The gap between PT and PTA education is too vast. Now that PT's are at a doctorate level, it makes sense to advance PTA's to Bachelor degree.

Posted by Denise Rackers on 6/15/2012 1:11 PM

Hi my name is Debbie and I am currently enrolled in West Kentucky Community and Technical College in Paducah KY. I have one more year there and will be recieving my Associates in Science and Associates in Arts. I am curious what degree level is expected to become a Physical Therapist. Does it vary from state to state? I am a little confused and seems at times my school is confused as well or they just do not know the answers. Thank you. Debbie Carter

Posted by Debbie Carter on 6/15/2012 1:15 PM

Would like more info for pta four year degree possibility... and how soon it will take place...

Posted by chad mixon, pta on 6/15/2012 1:21 PM

Debbie: Please see the resources for prospective students: http://www.apta.org/ProspectiveStudents/

Posted by News Now Staff on 6/15/2012 1:35 PM

Chad: As the story above states, the study would be submitted to the 2014 APTA House of Delegates (June 2014). The "possibility" and timeline after that would be influenced by the findings in the study.

Posted by News Now Staff on 6/15/2012 1:38 PM

Assuming there is an upgrade to the PTA education, what upgrade in education would that be exactly? I mean, I'm a PT student, and I have current PTA's in my cohort who say that there is a gap, but isn't that the point? Isn't that what separates a PT from a PTA?

Posted by Josh on 6/15/2012 2:48 PM

I for one am so glad that the research into transitioning has begun. It only makes sense to advance PTA education as well. Thank you APTA!

Posted by Jennifer Beard on 6/15/2012 3:19 PM

This would be a fantastic opportunity for our profession as a whole and open other professional possibilities for PTAs. Many management positions require holding a bachelor's degree as a minimum; this would be a natural progression for many in our profession and provide a solid future for physical therapy.

Posted by Kimberly Gerling on 6/15/2012 3:23 PM

I believe that in the changing healthcare arena, it is crucial for the PTA to advance their education to match that of the PT. As a new grad PTA, I support any measures to advance our programs to Bachelor's degree. Thank you!

Posted by allison harper on 6/15/2012 4:22 PM

This is a terrible idea but may lead to change in our seriously flawed academic model. Our academic institutions have continued to inflate the cost of PT education without forethought as to how new grads would be able to recoup the costs in a reasonable amount of time. With so many negative financial consequences of the transitions to MPT then DPT, it seems as if those in power were oblivious to the economic impact it would have. In many states the PTA programs are delivered via community colleges - the most reasonably priced institutions. To change to a bachelor's degree would only be a money grab for already out of touch academic institutions and faculty . Of the students we have received from both DPT and PTA programs, the PTAs are by far more able to quickly adapt from the classroom to the clinic. Whereas the DPTs in many cases are poorly prepared socially and mentally by their faculty for interacting with real people in pain. These DPTs many times have to unlearn the false facts and unsupported techniques/rules learned in the classroom. I worry that the excess classes may eliminate some of the better candidates as the DPT seems to have done.

Posted by Sean on 6/15/2012 5:35 PM

I'm in full support of this transition to take place. There is too large of a gap between a PT's education and a PTA's. I take both PT interns and PTA interns and see a huge difference. I am glad the APTA is trying to also find a way that the student would get some type of credit for already being a PTA and for looking at how we can still use some existing programs even though presently they are at a community junior college.

Posted by Arthur Baudendistel on 6/15/2012 5:51 PM

I am pleased that this motions is being taken seriously and will be studied. I agree with Sean in terms of the cost especially right now in our economy and with the transitions of Health Care laws, but I would like to see an graduated career ladder that allowed the PTA to accept additional resposibilities and develop additional skills. Of course this would need transitions within the practice acts in the USA and the Federation would need to be on board. I think with CAPTE moving out of APTA, a graduated career ladder could be something that would make good sense and match this transition. I would hope that the community colleges could retain their position as creating entry level PTA, but allow the 4 year schools the opportunity to move the Advance PTA to a higher level. With this move, maybe more PTAs would become involved in our professional organization. I wish this new task force good luck in obtaining the information they need to make a wise proposal for our profession's future. Martha Z.

Posted by Martha Zimmerman on 6/15/2012 7:11 PM

I'm not sure requiring a bachelors degree is necessarily the right thing for PTAs. One of the big draws for being a PTA as a "second career" or as a career that someone who can't afford to go to a 4 year program, but has the opportunity to go to a 2 year program. I feel like there's already too much pressure and financial hardship to get a college degree as is. Unless PTAs are going to get paid more and are going to have their responsibilities expanded more, I don't think its worth to get the 4 year education. Sean, I agree with what you said. I think its going to scare a lot of good potential candidates away.

Posted by Jennifer on 6/15/2012 7:34 PM

This is an interesting idea. However, I feel that at this time all PTA's should help work towards increasing the PTA membership in the APTA. Doubling the current low percentage would be a good goal to start with. I would challange anyone to explain to me how the membership of PTA at 8% in many states does not impact the PTA profession negitively. That should be the discussion now and the education later.

Posted by Bob Sheridan PTA on 6/15/2012 8:21 PM

To Bob's comment, I'm a PTA student at a well respected PT school. We are strongly encouraged to support our profession, and for the most part we do. I have heard that the PTA's only count for a 1/2 vote, so maybe if they would recognize a bit more than there would be more support.

Posted by Chris on 6/15/2012 11:10 PM

I'm all for it

Posted by Burton Ford, PT, DPT on 6/15/2012 11:36 PM

I want to voice my strong support for this motion. The PTA is at a place where we can grow in our ability to treat our patients better. The role of the House is to look at the future of our profession, not what is easy. I want to thank the Delegates that voted in support of this as well as the Minn. chapter for bring this motion forward. In our profession the PT has advanced from a BS to a MPT to a DPT. It is important for the extender of PT services advance as well. Change is never easy, but it is needed to grow our profession. I am proud to be a PTA and a member of the APTA.

Posted by Sean Bagbey -> ?GVZ?O on 6/16/2012 12:28 AM

This is a fantastic idea, even though it is about 10 years late to the table. There are many reasons why this is absolutely necessary (some which have already been posted), but the most important is to limit third party payers having a platform for reducing reimbursement based on PTA treatment vs. PT treatment (even if what was performed was completely identical). If this continues, facilities will reduce PTA use and/or salary which will reduce incentive for those considering a career as a PTA, which by natural process will reduce the number of PTAs which will increase workload on PTs and thereby causing patient access to be limited and patient care compromised in order to see those numbers who are "waiting". The result is further loss to DC, ATC, massage therapist, personal trainer, and alternative "treatment" professions (active and passive). This compromises the viability of the PT profession as a whole due to revenue competition (i.e. loss), damage to the brand, loss of respect from accessibility challenges, decreased one-on-one time possibility, and therefore reduced efficiency related to healing/recovery time which leads to patient dissatisfaction (which continues the demise in a different way). Please do this APTA, our future depends on progression of both positions..."you are only as strong as your 'weakest' link".

Posted by Barron Shultz on 6/16/2012 12:22 PM

OK. I want to be on the mailing lists necessary to keep up with the developments of the study. I am especially interested in the transition program.

Posted by Debra Dreher on 6/16/2012 3:44 PM

I appreciate the comments from previous posts, however I get the sense that most are PT's. I am a new PTA student and from my experience thus far, MANY of us are second career or later-in-life first career people who already have a bachelor's degree. Even the younger students are those who have already gone to a 4-year college and graduated.I attended my chapter meeting before the House of Delegates meeting and right now there is no structure as to what an additional 2-years schooling would involve. I'm not saying I'm against it, but unless it would all be Therapy related, what's the point really? There's a reason they are taking 2 years for the study and I for one hope those with all the voting rights will wait to hear what the results are before jumping on the band wagon of support.

Posted by Linda Boettger on 6/17/2012 7:19 AM

I believe this is a great idea for PTA's. Most of the programs I know could use increased class time in amputees, neurologic issues and increased affiliation times. As for the cost, sometimes you need to spend alittle to get a lot. An increase in our education would be worth the amount of cost invested in it.

Posted by Joe on 6/17/2012 9:04 AM

My question is if we do go for the 4 year degree, will a PT on site still be required to treat? Afterall the PT's themselves were only a 4 year degree a few years ago...

Posted by Julie on 6/17/2012 10:56 AM

I am a PTA that graduated in 1997 in Massachusetts. I have had the opportunity to have worked in all types of settings, including SNF, acute care hospitals, rehab hospitals, out patient. I have done extensive work in wound care. I have been surprised to realize that there is a vast knowledge base not only from college to college, but I have taught some of the PT's I have worked with some things that I thought they should have known. Simply because a person has a bachelor's degree, this does not compensate for the hands on learning experiences. I have looked into going back to college to become a PT. The college would not accept my core classes for my degree and stated that I would have to take all courses, as if I had no fundmental classes for my degree, ( i.e. neuro kineseology) I found this exteremly frustrating and decided not to further my education.

Posted by Wendy on 6/17/2012 9:07 PM

I'm a little suspect about it being a requirement. Realistically PTA's do everything except new eval's. Specializing in amputee's and neuro issues can be done just as well in continuing ed, I believe. I do believe if this does become the requirement then PTA's should be able to do new eval's. We know that the PT education level was raised to promote direct access. If doesn't serve as much of a purpose for PTA's to stay in school to learn interventions that can be learned in continuing ed.

Posted by chris on 6/17/2012 9:59 PM

John stated, "Most of the programs I know could use increased class time in amputees, neurologic issues and increased affiliation times." That may be true. However nobody really learns how to perform any interventions in school, other than ultrasound, et al. We learn the vast majority on our clinical affiliations. The BS would just add more non-therapy classes, which only serves to boost university revenues. Wendy, isn't it odd that the higher degree PTs get, the less the students seem to know? We really need to get more excellent clinicians in the schools, and purge the programs of the career academics.

Posted by Sean on 6/18/2012 11:51 AM

Everyone needs to stop complaining about the increase in time to finish college. The thought process behind enhancing the education of the PT field is so that the scope of practice will be expanded, regardless of the fact of whether or not there is any difference in the clinicians abilities from MSPT to DPT or Associates to Bachelors, if the PT is expanding to a doctoral profession there assistants need to be at least Bachelor degree holds. This is simply the progression of the field which will eventually result in increased reimbursement leading to higher salaries etc. Just relax and stop complaining.

Posted by Noah on 6/18/2012 3:36 PM

I am a recent DPT graduate who not only received excellent theoretical training but also clinical training. Most of the people I work with are impressed at the manual skills I know AND learned in school. Granted I went to one of the top 10 schools in the country for my profession but for those who keep trying to state new grads don't know anything based on your experience with a handful of them, this is unsound logic. As for the 4 year program for PTAs, I believe my question is what do you want me to do now? I already have PTAs who introduce themselves to patients as PTs. Will I just be doing evaluations and discharges now? The set up is starting to mirror the physicians....sure I can see 40+ pts a day now but when do I get to do all of the fun stuff that drew me to the profession to begin with. The corporations are already trying to adopt this model, PTAs treat and PTs just oversee. Its cheaper for employers I guess.

Posted by rachel on 6/18/2012 7:39 PM

I think this is a move that has to happen to keep up with the advancement of the profession. Over the years the PT has moved from bachelor level to doctorate. Yet, the PTA education has not changed at all. I can see a couple of benefits of advancing to a bachelor's level. For one, as someone else mentioned, a higher degree may help prevent future decreases in reimbursement for the PTA. Also, a bachelor PTA would have a smoother transition to a DPT if desired. As it is now, none of the PTA educational curriculum counts towards a PT degree. So for a PTA without a bachelor's degree to become a PT would require a fresh start in school versus just taking the 3 years on top of the potential PTA bachelor degree. I also think a bachelor's degree PTA program would produce a higher quality PTA because it would require more time and dedication.

Posted by Seth Elliott, PTA on 6/19/2012 11:37 AM

I wish Noah was right. Maybe we can spend our way out of debt too! @Rachel, that's probably why your program is so highly ranked. However a school ranked in the mid 20s is quite possibly putting out the worst prepared students ever. It's not just the didactic learning part that is wrong at these schools, it's the admission process. 4.0 GPAs and a couple affirmative action admits excludes too many possibly great candidates.

Posted by sean on 6/19/2012 3:54 PM

PTA's were orginially created to replace on the job trained P.T. aides. Both P.T.'s and PTA's advanced their training on the job and by taking courses to become more skilled. PTA's will remain in a marginal role whether they have more formal education or not. If PTA's are to advance their education, then it seems to me that that our autonomy should be advanced as well. I would rather see programs created to advance PTA's to become RPT's.

Posted by Linda on 6/21/2012 3:02 PM

Whether further education is obtained while in a PTA program or through CEU's after the PTA is in practice, I feel that Barron Shults hit the nail on the head in his comments regarding reimbursement issues and accessibility to PT services by the patient.

Posted by Julie on 6/21/2012 5:26 PM

I've been a PTA for 18 years and just finishing my DPT. The transition of the PT degree to a DPT was for autonomy. The PT is responsible for the patient and the PTA assisting in treating the patient under the supervision of the PT. There is no reason to further the PTA degree. If the APTA wants more support form the PTAs in this country, they need to show them more respect and give them more say in the association and create more opportunities for the PTA to advance their education. BY the way I have been an APTA member ever since PTA school - it's our profession and whether there are problems with the APTA or not we need to support our profession.

Posted by Jerry Yarborough SPT, PTA on 6/21/2012 11:59 PM

So is there a problem with the services that PTAs provide? Is this coming up again because PTAs aren't filling a job need? - or is this coming up as a change for change sake?

Posted by carla on 6/22/2012 3:15 PM

Keep the debate simple. How does this proposal benefit patient care? Shouldn't that be the deciding factor when considering a change that significantly impacts our profession? The best data available to answer this question is the relatively recent transition of PTs from MSPT to DPT. In general, across the nation, is patient care better now since DPTs have arrived on the scene? That answer is debatable but these facts are not: PTs' salaries in the clincal setting are not dependent on their academic degree, autonomy of practice is not greater due to the DPT degree, college debt is now greater for PT graduates, raising the academic requirements has not increased the number of PT graduates (possibly the opposite), third-party payment for PT services are declining. These neutral/negative consequences are going to be further expanded by doing to the PTA programs what has been done to the PT programs. Oh, there is one other indisputable fact, these changes result in academic institutions making more money. So APTA Delegates (and whoever else that will be responsible for pushing through this change) what's your motivation for initiating this proposal? If you think it is improved patient care, then you need to get out into the real working world of staff shortages, declining reimbursement, and new PT graduates with hugh financial debt expecting higher salaries whose clinical skills for the workplace are no better than their MSPT and BSPT counterparts.

Posted by Marti Miller PT on 6/22/2012 3:33 PM

Thank you Julie, and thank you Jerry for your comments regarding PTA recognition. However, the APTA is limited with regards to this as there are states who still do not require PTAs to be licensed. Unless and until all states have a level "playing" field with regards to licensure and continuing competency requirements (or at the very least require SOME), there will continue to be an anchor slowing down our "progress" towards reaching goals of vision 2020 and beyond. Progression of any profession means absolute standards across the nation, and entry level education should be at the highest degree available (with all doctorate programs being accepted as the "highest" level).Therefore, it is simple to maintain the "gap" between PT and PTA due to education level even if the PTA is progressed to a bachelor degree. This is a moot point because our practice acts require the clinical distinction no matter what the education of a PT or PTA is even if the PTA has an advanced degree and the PT is a BSPT. The comments regarding cost of degree increasing are also non-valid for the argument because the same arguments have been made in the past with transitions of the PT degree, and if nothing else it has probably enriched the quality of candidates more than it eliminated quality. There are schools which have considered and/or are considering bridge programs for PTA to PT, but going from a 2 year degree with little in common with the 7 year is much more costly and wasteful than going from 4 year to 7 year. I would like to think that this may also enhance the quality and retention of PT school candidates who are trying to progress from the PTA level. How much more passion and dedication can one demonstrate for our profession than being willing to do that?

Posted by Barron Shultz on 6/22/2012 4:09 PM

As a PTA who had a PhD prior to going to PTA school, I am in full support of the PTA program going to a Bachelor's degree. If a program changes from an Associates program toa Bachelor's program without practical clinical advancement of the graduate, something is wrong with that program. The pressures to be able to "hit the ground running" and treat clients immediately uppon graduating are increasing. There are few opportunities to learn "on the job" - therapists are stressed trying to manage their own productivity requirements making it tough to take time to educate others. We need to provide more opprotuinites for PTAs to be trained both in the classroom and in clinicals. As for those pointing fingers at the "APTA", this is an organization made up of therapists. The therapsists who are members make up the APTA and vote for people to represent us in the decision making process. Outsiders are those who choose not to be members and part of the process.

Posted by Diane on 6/23/2012 4:45 PM

With the advance of the PT to the DPT level it would seem only natural for the PTA to advance to the BS level. This would allow for increased clinical education hours with improved treatment techniques. What is learned in a CEU weekend course does not make you compentent in providing that treatment skill which is true for both the PT and the PTA. Expanded clnical training with a PT would enhance the PTA skills more. There are now more community colleges that are able to award BS degrees than when the PTA programs were started. A BS degree would allow for the PTA to advance their education to be a PT or to go into another profession. An AS degree allows you to only be a PTA..

Posted by Vanie on 6/25/2012 11:01 AM

I am a student at Mercyhurst Northeast in the PTA program. I feel there is so much to learn in such a short period of time. I wish I could of taken this over four years. If the PTA program does turn into a four-year degree format does that mean a PTA who completes it and receives a BA degree would be more desirable for hire rather than someone like me who will receive a two-year degree?

Posted by Chris Slusarz on 6/25/2012 6:00 PM

BARRON: Good points! Are you also writing the new Geico "chain of events" commercials? Sounds similar! RACHEL: I too am frequently approached by new grads as well as seasoned PTs who know nothing about a treatment and look to me for information or performance of a technique. Go Figure. As far as the PTAs you know who introduce themselves as PTs - "Nip it in the bud!" If you aren't taking action with the licensure board to have them reprimanded and allow it to continue then shame on you! A PTA knows better. Likewise, PTAs would appreciate being referred to with APTA recognized branding. It's Physical Therapist Assistant, not Physical Therapy Assistant or LPTA. Note too that PT is not RPT as mentioned by Linda. APTA's position is for two distinctions to ease and solidify therapist recognition by consumers: PT and PTA. I'm not sure this degree advancement debate will ever end. I've been practicing 11 years, an APTA member for 12, and listening to it all along.

Posted by Beverly Flynn on 6/26/2012 7:48 AM

I am Patrick Doran, president of the Indian River State College PTA program class of 2013 based out of Fort Pierce, FL. We have discussed the proposed transition in class and one of the issues that came up was how credits will transfer for those interested in continuing on to get their DPT after PTA. I myself chose to do PTA as a stepping stone to the DPT program to gain clinical knowledge, to network, and to to gain experience in therapist/patient interactions. One thing I found out after starting the program is that the classes I take now, even though we use the same books and similar curriculum, do not transfer or count for anything when entering a DPT program. My question is if PTA is bumped up to a BS program then would the credits earned be able to transfer to DPT programs? There should be an option to at least test out of certain aspects of the curriculum so we could save money as students. What are others thoughts on this??

Posted by Patrick Doran on 6/27/2012 11:17 PM

As a brand spanking new PTA student on my second career, WITH a BS, my concern is this- what do you do for someone like me who already HAS a BS? Do I still have to go back to school for 4 years, to take the same core curriculum, the same science classes, etc just to say I am better trained? Would I actually be better trained? One of the reasons I chose this path was the relatively short time of study to get a great, rewarding job. Would there be a separate path available to those of us who already hold a degree? Also, as Barron pointed out- I think the APTA needs to start with petitioning all states to require a PTA to be licensed. I think that will do more for patient care, outcomes, liabilities, respect, etc. Get that taken care of and then tackle the amount of education required.

Posted by Jennifer on 6/28/2012 8:56 PM

I have read several opinions on this thread and all have legitimate concerns. The one that keeps sticking out to me is those who are already PTAs having to go back to school for another 2 years. It would seem that the PT world could learn something from the skilled trades. Would not an on the job apprenticeship program with minimal school time serve us just as well? There is no replacement for on the job experience. If the level of the program is to raised then PTAs should be able to translate time worked for education.

Posted by John Stapleton on 7/3/2012 12:31 PM

I think it is an awesome idea to make the PTA curriculum a 4 year degree. I just graduated from a PTA program last December of 2011 and I now have 2 Associates degrees. It makes it hard to continue back to school and continue working on a B.A. It costs even more money and time. I totally support the idea and hope that it goes through. If it does would it apply to me and other PTA's that have already graduated?

Posted by Collin Liston on 10/9/2012 8:04 PM

Im curious about that as well Collin, i start the PTA program in March, and if it goes through in 2014 (when i graduate)...would it affect me?..also is the PTA program close to becoming obsolete....because i have heard this said due to the RC3-11 law?...anybody know anything about this?

Posted by Te'Arra Howard on 10/12/2012 5:39 PM

I am very concerned about for profit institutions offering PTA programs. These are not community colleges some if them are healthcare training "schools". Like Kieser and a place like Taylor College in Belleview, FL..This is a for profit school that as of a a few years ago had there "classes" at a strip mall..Then they changed there name, to Taylor College and moved into a steel framed building, looks like a warehouse..then they decided to open a PTA program..applied, the APTA standards are so low for opening a school they approved them...Huh? Plus there is already a PTA program at a community college just 20 miles away..This will flood the PTA job market in this area..Prereqs for the so called program are a joke compared to what we had to take..classes like "Liberal Arts Math" or "History". are you serious? If you give the PTA degree away to anybody it will be worth nothing..There nursing program license exam pass rates are among the lowest in the state and have a approx. 4.5 more students fail the exam than those at the nearby community college..We need to stop for profit places like this from offering professional degrees like the PTA..Did i mention they cost 4-5x more than a community college..ridiculous!!!

Posted by Matt on 10/13/2012 12:37 PM

I am a senior at a university in TX and will be graduating with a BS in fitness and human performance in May. I have been working as a PT tech for almost 2 years. When I started my job I did not know anything about the PT profession. I have fallen in love with it! However, I have been in school for 6 years and dont have an easy financial state. I have looked into PT schools and PTA schools. I would love to get my DPT but dont have time to take the physics, chem, and a couple others. I have bios, stats, ect that I needed for my degree. Due to already being 25 PTA is starting to look more appealing because I am qualified to enter the program asap. The only thing that stops me is not wanting to be looked down upon by my peers. Some of the PTs I talk to or have heard talking tend to down the PTA or look at them like they are small. I am a strong woman who has a college education and I want to make a good living in an area I love. Making this transition would make me happy due to the sense of accomplishment that PTAs would feel. I am considering taking the remaining prereqs for DPT after I get my PTA and going back to school later on after I work a while, start a family, and get on with my life for a couple years after school! If they would make a way for PTAs to feel and be looked at as more of an accomplished individual I think more and more people would want to be apart of it.

Posted by NIcole on 11/8/2012 8:39 PM

Good intention with unintentional consequences. One good consequence is that it will maintain or increase salary for DPT and PTA because it will further keep the supply low and demand higher than it is today. The Negative consequence is the quality of care for our patients will go down. Would public elementary schools increase a teachers credential at a time when there is very high demand for teachers and low supply of teachers and if they do would that increase class size? Well at least, public school will get paid for grouping students...

Posted by Billy on 11/14/2012 1:17 PM

I think it's a great idea and not sure it would necessarily require much change. The PTA program itself is two year but you still have ore requisites to get in. Count those as under grad and add more in depth treatment protocols to the program itself...4 year degree. I love how some PTs point out that they went to school 7 years counting undergrad course work but not for ptas.

Posted by Jake on 12/5/2012 9:16 PM

I am a PTA with five years of experience in the field. I have worked side by side with PT's who have anywhere from Bachelor's to a Doctorate degree. I have yet to have a patient who can tell the difference during a treatment between a myself and their PT. At least in my setting (inpatient), the PTA does everything the PT does in a treatment. So my question is this: if the profession feels a therapist requires a Doctorate degree, how in the world do they feel an Associate's degree is adequate for the assistant? In my state I do not require any on-site supervision from a PT in order to practice. I feel as though either PT's really don't need a Doctorate degree or PTA's should definitely have the opportunity to advance to a Bachelor's degree. Also, what better undergrad could a PT student have? I had wanted to continue my education and earn my DPT however am unable to do so because none of my credits for PTA transfer to the Universities with PT programs, meaning I would have to go to school for at least 7 more years full time to earn my DPT despite all my experience. I feel stuck, like I lack potential for any advancement in my profession. It infuriates me. Maybe a Bachelor's degree doesn't need to be mandated; but I feel it should at least be an opportunity.

Posted by Janelle on 1/14/2013 9:03 PM

I think it is great that the PTA will eventually have a 4 year degree. I am a PTA and about to finish my bachelors degree which only accepted so many credits from my AS degree. When I attended PTA school over 10 years ago, I had to complete about a year or more of pre-requisites which included college algebra, psychology, and 2 semesters of english as well as the anatomy and phisiology classes. Most programs require this, which means we go to school for 3 years for a 2 year degree, so it makes sense to add one more year and get a higher degree. Thank you. It will save anyone who wants to further their education at a later date. Currently, I am struggling with deciding to return to DPT school because of the cost factor. Easily 100K of debt doesn't sound appealing despite loving the profession. I know I can do the work, but many PTs tell me not to do it because of the cost now, its not worth it. So, an MBA may be the next step. And, I don't think the PTA profession is going anywhere.

Posted by K. Faust on 3/3/2013 6:15 PM

I agree with Matt - if the APTA accredidates the PTA program at Taylor College in Belleview, FL it will decrease the perception and reputation of The PTA profession in our area. If a for-profit school is just going to churn out graduates we are all as a whole going to start being perceived as less skilled and knowledgeable. The SNFs who ultimately want the cheapest will fill up with these grads because they get to pay them $5 to $10 less per hour and it will drive the salaries down in the area. I will lose my last shred of respect for the APTA if they accredit this program. Instead of a bachelors degree with questionable benefits from the time money and effort, how about more options for specialization and more tangible results for specializing?

Posted by PTA on 3/20/2013 8:47 PM

What good would a bachelors degree do? Would it improve the level of patient care? Would it give PTAs better opportunities? No, and no. So, what is the point of this?

Posted by Betty on 3/22/2013 7:59 PM

If a bachelor's degree would allow a PTA to move into adminstrative postions such as Health Care Info Mgt, etc then it would be a benefit. Much of the point is to have more hands on clinic readiness and keep options open for those who need to often go back to school for a 2nd career who may, due to family or other responsibilities would not be able to enter a 4 year degree. Also as mentioned above, unless the pay level increases, the return makes little sense. If either the PTA can be licensed at 2 yrs, with the options of Health care mgt or continuing onto PT with the 4 yr then it would be an improvement, otherwise you are just hurting the field and losing good candidates

Posted by Janicee Fish on 4/24/2013 6:26 PM

My AAS PTA degree required me to take several classes outside the program as prereqs (which in a Bachelor's would be req anyway and be rewarded with a Bach at the end) and also it compressed the neuroscience classes, arguably the most difficult and the most important classes, into 6 wks in length to accomodate for a clincial experience in the same semester, and I received no training in documentation. By rolling in the pre-reqs, and expanding the neuroscience classes to a full semester, plus adding a full course on documentation formats, that program, housed at the College of Southern Nevada in Las Vegas, would be just one semester shy of a full 4 year program. our education regarding vestibular? 1 lecture. Massage? 1 lecture, 1 practical. Was MDT discussed? No. Ws there any discussion on motivation, or basic nutrition so we could understand the relationship between exercise and eating for those patients who show up at clinic on an empty stomach? Nah. The dirty little secret is that we got nearly the equivalent of a Bachelor's degree, but we didn't get any of the academic credit for it, and in order to keep us at an AAS level, they scrimped on classes that are clinically crucial. Make the change.

Posted by Carolyn Senn on 4/26/2013 11:51 AM