Skip to main content

Recent features on Good Morning America and WebMD aside, the idea that low back pain (LBP) is best managed through nondrug, nonsurgical approaches isn't exactly news to physical therapists (PTs) and physical therapist assistant (PTAs). What would be news is if health care systems and providers widely accepted that reality and began taking steps to apply evidence to practice and payment.

The latest rise in media attention on LBP was sparked by a recent series of articles published in The Lancet (free registration required) that highlighted the lack of adherence to clinical practice guidelines advocating "self-management, physical and psychological therapies" as first-line treatment for LBP. It's a disconnect that authors believe deserves immediate attention, given that LBP is the leading cause of disability worldwide, and is a condition that is increasing more rapidly in low-income and middle-income countries, according to the Lancet articles.

The problem, according to the authors, is that despite the evidence, many providers—including some PTs—still recommend rest and time off work, and the use of drugs and surgery is more prevalent than it should be.

"The message here is the critical need to close the evidence-practice gap across all aspects of spine care," said Julie Fritz, PT, PhD, FAPTA, a co-author of the study. "This message applies to physical therapy as [much as] it does to all other providers who may continue to advocate for overuse of ineffective treatments such as opioids and imaging. Professional stewardship demands that we examine our own profession even as we critique aspects of practice in other professions."

By way of example, the Lancet articles point out that physical modalities such as transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) or ultrasound have been found to be ineffective but often are recommended by PTs in many countries. One study cited found that 75% of US PTs used lumbar traction, and 38% of Swedish PTs used TENS; another cited study from India reported that one-third of PTs preferred physical modalities as first-line interventions.

The gap is even more prevalent when it comes to the use of psychological therapies in combination with physical modalities—an approach that has proven to be effective. According to the Lancet articles, a recent study found that just 8.4% of patients with LBP in the US were prescribed cognitive behavioral therapy.

"Care for patients with chronic conditions such as low back pain is inherently multidisciplinary," says Fritz. "There are opportunities for innovative care delivery models that integrate mental and physical health care providers, and PTs should welcome the chance to be a part of these programs. Triaging patients based on their mental health needs should be a part of physical therapist practice in the same manner as triage for physical needs."

According to the Lancet authors, the problem isn't just about lack of action by providers—patient barriers to proper care for LBP also play a role in the problem on a worldwide scale. Authors advocate changes from health care systems that often reimburse surgery or medication over other interventions to systems that reimburse only evidence-backed treatments. Experts also recommend the development of "clear care pathways, referral, funding, and information technology systems" that would help clinicians deliver the most effective care at the right time.

"All countries seem to be struggling with the same fundamental problem of closing the evidence-practice gap for patients with low back pain but there are lessons to be learned," Fritz observes. "Payment models in other countries are quite different from our fee-for-service model in the United States. These payment models certainly influence the overutilization of high-cost, low-value care such as back surgery. Other countries are also beginning to modify the basic care pathways for musculoskeletal pain conditions, with greater opportunity for physical therapists to serve as first-contact providers. Efforts in the Netherlands and United Kingdom, among others, bear watching."

You Might Also Like...


Takeaways From the Proposed 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, Part 2

Jul 16, 2024

The proposed rule includes small changes to telehealth policies and the Quality Payment Program.


Takeaways From the Proposed 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, Part 1

Jul 16, 2024

Cuts continue, but APTA's advocacy helped spark positive movement related to PTA supervision, prior authorization, and more.


Overturn of Chevron Deference Standard: The Impact on Health Care

Jul 15, 2024

The June 2024 legal decision will shake up the health care regulatory landscape. APTA will share new information on the impact as it becomes available.