Skip to main content

In 2017, Mike Nilsen, PT, DPT, determined that 40% of his patients with neck pain failed to progress or show clinically meaningful improvement.

The Power of Predictive Analytics

"I wasn't very happy with this," he says, "so I started performing chart reviews. I looked at the patients who didn't improve to see if I'd made any glaring mistakes. Did I not assess something? Did I not progress something?"

Nilsen, a staff physical therapist (PT) with Intermountain Healthcare in West Valley City, Utah, reviewed APTA's clinical practice guidelines and Intermountain's care process models, looking for discrepancies between patients who did and did not improve. Although he confirmed that his treatment followed protocols and best practices, he also saw that he had better results when he progressed treatment a bit further. He identified a few small tweaks that could make a big difference.

Log in or create a free account to keep reading.

Join APTA to get unlimited access to content.

You Might Also Like...


Landmark APTA Report Makes the Case for Physical Therapy's Economic Value

Sep 27, 2023

The macroeconomic review of eight conditions shows how physical therapy delivers cost-effectiveness through quality-of-life improvements.


Maley Lecturer Calls for More Clinician Scientists in Physical Therapy

Aug 1, 2023

Stacey Dusing, PT, PhD, FAPTA, believes it's time to close the gaps between research and practice.


Seminal APTA Guide to PT Practice Gets an Update

Apr 12, 2023

The physical therapy profession has evolved, and so has its foundational resource.