Skip to main content

In 2017, Mike Nilsen, PT, DPT, determined that 40% of his patients with neck pain failed to progress or show clinically meaningful improvement.

The Power of Predictive Analytics

"I wasn't very happy with this," he says, "so I started performing chart reviews. I looked at the patients who didn't improve to see if I'd made any glaring mistakes. Did I not assess something? Did I not progress something?"

Nilsen, a staff physical therapist (PT) with Intermountain Healthcare in West Valley City, Utah, reviewed APTA's clinical practice guidelines and Intermountain's care process models, looking for discrepancies between patients who did and did not improve. Although he confirmed that his treatment followed protocols and best practices, he also saw that he had better results when he progressed treatment a bit further. He identified a few small tweaks that could make a big difference.

Log in or create a free account to keep reading.

Join APTA to get unlimited access to content.

You Might Also Like...


APTA's Registry Is a Bridge Between Research and Practice

Jun 23, 2021

APTA spoke with Megan Valenzano, PT, DPT, compliance officer and director of regulatory affairs at Fox Rehabilitation, about her experience with APTA's


APTA's Outcomes Registry Again Receives Key CMS Designation

Jan 19, 2021

The APTA Physical Therapy Outcomes Registry has been approved as a qualified clinical data registry — an important benefit for PTs in MIPS.


The Physical Therapy Outcomes Registry: 2019 by the Numbers

Dec 11, 2019

The Registry integrates with EHRs to help providers easily benchmark patient outcomes, participate in the MIPS, and improve patient care.