Skip to main content

The physical therapist assistant pay differential that CMS is preparing to apply isn't just a matter of money — the policy also threatens patient access to care and how we provide that care, and it flies in the face of what we know to be true through our education to become PTs and PTAs. We must act now.

For my practice in central Missouri, the proposed payment differential presents several challenges. The financial implications are obvious: At a time when practices are saddled with more administrative burden, struggling to recover from damage done by a pandemic, and facing further reductions in payment, CMS is devaluing one of our key strengths.

The fact is, the work of our PTAs is crucial to many practices' ability to weather the mounting challenges we face. Paying less for services provided by a PTA only widens the gap between the cost of doing business and what we are paid. 

Log in or create a free account to keep reading.

Join APTA to get unlimited access to content.

You Might Also Like...


Members-Only Payment Advocacy Resource Collection Grows

Mar 21, 2023

The resource center, created by APTA and APTA Private Practice, now offers information on MPPR, the PTA differential, and more.


APTA-Backed PTA Supervision Legislation Is a Win-Win-Win

Nov 21, 2022

The bipartisan bill now in the Senate would replace the direct supervision requirement for private practice with general supervision.


APTA Advocacy Roundup: What's Been Passed by Congress, What's Still on the Table

Sep 20, 2022

Here's the status of APTA-supported legislation on the fee schedule, telehealth, prior authorization, the PTA differential, and more.