Skip to main content

Feature-ValueBasedPayment-1.png

Historically, the U.S. health care system has had different payment methodologies, depending on the care setting. Hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home health agencies typically have been paid under a prospective payment system model, while outpatient care typically has been reimbursed on a fee-for-service or discounted fee-for-service basis.

FFS, which has been used for decades, directs health care insurers to pay health care professionals for each intervention provided to the patient. (Discounted FFS, typically within managed care arrangements, calls for discounts on regular FFS fees when patients use in-network providers.) Critics of FFS — as described in the June 5, 2014, Forbes article "More Health Care Is Better Health Care: Myth or Reality?" — long have argued that it incentivizes health care professionals to provide and bill for the highest number of health care services per patient during each visit, even if the need for such services is not indicated.

Log in or create a free account to keep reading.


Join APTA to get unlimited access to content.


You Might Also Like...

News

Congressional Advocacy by the Numbers: Together, We Are Driving Payment Progress

Feb 10, 2026

APTA members helped drive a wave of federal advocacy wins in 2025, including the reversal of years of stagnant Medicare payment. The numbers tell the story:

Article

APTA State Chapters Record 48 Wins in 2025, Work Continues in 2026

Feb 10, 2026

The new APTA Strategic Framework for 2030 reinforces the association's commitment to advancing payment, and that dedication goes far beyond APTA's fight

Resource

APTA State Advocacy Map

Feb 9, 2026

Members can seamlessly navigate through the widget map to discern whether a state chapter supports, opposes, or is neutral on a bill.