Skip to main content

Ms. Hurdler is a 20-year-old collegiate 400-meter hurdler who trains daily and has Olympic aspirations. Ms. Walker is a 40-year-old woman who walks three days a week per her physician’s orders to control her hypertension and lower her serum glucose levels. Ms. Sprinter is a 40-year-old woman with no comorbidities who runs six days a week and competes in track and field sports. Ms. Runner is a 70-year-old woman with stage 1 hypertension who trains five days a week and competes in 10K road races. 

All four women sustain a primary grade II lateral ankle sprain and see the same physical therapist, each receiving eight treatments over an average of eight weeks. 

This is Ms. Hurdler’s first athletic injury, she is relatively young, and her recovery is rapid. The PT implements a sport-specific rehabilitation plan, successfully returning her to hurdling. 

Ms. Walker meets her functional goal of returning to walking within eight weeks and tells everyone about her brilliant therapist! 

Ms. Sprinter is jogging pain-free at eight weeks but is struggling to return to pain-free running. She is declined coverage for further rehabilitation that could return her to her prior level of function, as this is considered sports rehabilitation and deemed not medically necessary. Despite diligently doing home exercises, she never completely meets her goals and begrudgingly retires from competitive track and field. Ms. Sprinter tells everyone her PT failed her.

After eight weeks, Ms. Runner is progressing toward her goal of returning to her sport when her Medicare Advantage administrator declines further coverage, stating that she’s met the criteria of independence in performing activities of daily living. She attempts to return to running but is quickly reinjured, owing to incomplete resolution of her original complaint. Unable to run without pain, she stops and loses contact with her “running family.” Like Ms. Sprinter, she believes her PT has failed her.  

The experiences of these four women illustrate the shortcomings of a one-size-fits-all sentiment. Health insurance coverage for outpatient musculoskeletal rehabilitation disregards variability in prior level of function, rehabilitation progress, and personal recovery goals.

Log in or create a free account to keep reading.

Join APTA to get unlimited access to content.

You Might Also Like...


APTA Guidance on Use of New Caregiver Training Codes Now Available

Dec 4, 2023

APTA's practice advisory helps PTs and PTAs understand how and when to use the codes, including documentation requirements.


UHC Says Treatment Time Can Be Used in Lieu of Start and Stop Time

Nov 29, 2023

The latest clarification from the mega-insurer comes after it released a set of burdensome policy expansions earlier this year.


Win (for Now, at Least): Aetna Backs Away From PTA Differential

Nov 1, 2023

Aetna put its decision on hold, giving APTA time to press for a permanent shift. Other news from the insurer isn't as good.